Understand what the research actually says. And where it breaks down.

Type any topic. Fieldnotes searches across academic papers, policy reports, community research, think tank publications, and practitioner research — then builds a structured audio briefing, written the way a brilliant friend would explain it. Honest about the evidence. Honest about the mess.

Free to start, no credit card Papers, policy reports & practitioner knowledge
~5 minquick brief~12 mindeep dive~20 minfull seminar
Sample Fieldnote
12 min

Urban heat islands & climate adaptation strategies

Ch 1 / 5The City That Got Hotter as It Got Richer
0:0012:00
Source integrity87%
14 sources
1The City That Got Hotter as It Got Richer
2What We Thought Trees Could Do
3Then the Data Got Complicated

+ 2 more chapters

Not a summary. A guided journey through what the evidence actually says.

A summary tells you the conclusion. A Fieldnote tells you the story — the received wisdom, the study that complicated it, the researchers who disagree, and the question nobody has answered yet.

The host has read everything on the topic and is telling you what they found — what's striking, what's counterintuitive, and where the science is genuinely messy. Not briefing a committee. Talking to a thoughtful friend who has twenty minutes on the train.

01

Type a topic or question

Start with whatever is on your mind. "Just transition policy." "Youth employment in West Africa." Something you've been meaning to understand for months.

02

Choose your listen

Pick your length — 5, 12, or 20 minutes. Set your context — Commute, Workout, Winding down, or Focused read. The tone and depth adapt to fit where you actually are.

03

We build your Fieldnote

Our system draws from 200M+ open academic papers, policy reports, and think tank briefs. Minutes later: a guided audio seminar, a debate map, source-traced claims, and an unresolved question worth sitting with.

04

Your knowledge accumulates

Resume where you left off. Add notes, tag ideas, subscribe to the topic. Everything lands in your Research Notebook — a personal knowledge base that gets richer every session.

Not just academic papers. The full landscape of published knowledge.

Most tools search one type of source. Fieldnotes searches across six — and classifies, ranks, and traces every result.

Academic research

Semantic Scholar + OpenAlex — ranked by recency and citation count

Policy documents

World Bank, government reports, intergovernmental briefs

Open access research

CORE — the world's largest open access aggregator

Think tanks & institutions

Brookings, RAND, OECD, Gates Foundation, and hundreds more

Practitioner & community knowledge

The Open Library — researcher and practitioner submissions

Curated canonical sources

A hand-maintained library of foundational texts across every domain

Ground truth — current events

GDELT, Global Voices, and ReliefWeb — real-time voices from 65+ countries

Source integrity score

Every Fieldnote shows what percentage of claims trace back to a specific paper or DOI — and what percentage is synthesised from broader knowledge. The Sources tab lists all references with type badges and links.

Every claim, placed. Every tension, named.

Alongside the audio, every Fieldnote includes a structured map of the intellectual landscape — the strongest arguments in favour, the strongest counter-arguments, and the genuine tensions researchers haven't resolved. Each claim is attributed to a source. You can flag anything you think is wrong, outdated, or missing a perspective.

In favour

3

Urban tree canopy reduces surface temperatures by up to 8°C in dense city cores

Bowler et al.2010

Green infrastructure generates $3–7 of co-benefits per $1 invested

Elmqvist et al.2015

Night-time cooling from vegetation reduces heat-related mortality by 15–30% in vulnerable populations

Gasparrini et al.2017

Counter-arguments

2

Irrigation demands for urban greenery can offset climate benefits in water-scarce regions

Pataki et al.2011

Cooling effects are highly localised — rarely extending beyond 100m from the intervention

Norton et al.2015

Unresolved

2

Whether city-wide cooling requires networked green corridors or can be achieved through fragmented planting

Ziter et al.2019

How cooling benefits are distributed across income levels within the same city

Gasparrini et al.2017

From a real Fieldnote on urban heat islands. Generate your own →

Built for real life, not a research library.

Four controls, one Fieldnote. Choose your length, set your listening context, pick a debate lens, and tell us who you are. The output changes at every level — not just tone, but structure, framing, and the questions it leaves you with.

Choose your length

Quick brief

The core argument in a nutshell

~5 min

Deep dive

Full arc — complication, disagreement, open question

~12 min

Full seminar

Every dimension, every nuance unpacked

~20 min

Set your context

Commute

Punchy, energetic. Tight sentences. Momentum.

Workout

Bold, direct. Clear stakes. Minimal hedging.

Winding down

Calm, reflective. A little philosophical.

Focused read

Analytical, thorough. Every nuance included.

Same research, same topic — the energy, sentence length, and pacing adapt to where you actually are.

Debate lens

— how should the evidence be framed?

Balanced

All sides, equal weight

Compelling

The strongest case for it

Critical

Sceptical, challenges the evidence

Exploratory

Open questions and unknowns

Personalise

— role, purpose, and focus

Who is this for?

StudentResearcherProfessionalPolicymakerJournalistOther

What's the purpose?

Education / classPersonal researchBusiness decisionPolicy developmentJournalismOther

For questions about what's coming, not just what is.

When you ask a forward-looking question — "the future of X", "where is Y headed", "what could change about Z" — Fieldnotes detects it and switches to foresight mode.

The host becomes a strategic analyst and futures thinker. The narrative shifts from research synthesis to signal reading: what is already in motion, which futures are plausible, what nobody can yet resolve.

The evidence map changes too — trends, opportunities, and uncertainties instead of for, against, and unresolved. Reflection prompts ask what you would experiment with, what assumption you would challenge, what signal you would watch.

Try a foresight question
Trends in motion

Remote work has permanently redistributed labour supply away from superstar cities — commuter rail usage in London and NYC remains 20–30% below 2019 levels.

Opportunities worth exploring

Distributed infrastructure investment models — funding roads, broadband, and housing in secondary cities ahead of population movement rather than behind it.

Key uncertainties

Whether proximity benefits in innovation clusters are recoverable through hybrid arrangements, or whether dispersion permanently erodes them.

Geographic gap

94% of studies on urban heat mitigation come from North America, Europe, and East Asia. Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia — where the problem is most acute — is sparse.

Methodological gap

Most cooling studies use short observation windows (1–3 years). Long-term data on whether green infrastructure benefits persist or degrade over decades is largely absent.

Perspective gap

Frontline urban practitioners — maintenance teams, housing officers, community groups — are almost entirely absent from the academic literature on implementation.

Every Fieldnote tells you what the sources can't tell you.

When the evidence is geographically concentrated, Fieldnotes flags it. When the studies are all from one era, or all use the same method, or all come from academic institutions with no practitioner voice — it says so.

The evidence gaps section names 3–5 specific gaps: where, why they matter, and what kind of research would fill them.

This is not a disclaimer. It is part of the output. Understanding the shape of what is missing is part of understanding the topic.

Upload your material. Let it lead.

Upload your interviews, field notes, transcripts, or reports and Fieldnotes builds the briefing around your material. Your direct quotes, specific findings, and named participants are preserved and foregrounded.

The broader academic and policy literature is brought in to corroborate, challenge, and extend what you found — not to replace it. The source diversity tracker shows how your material sits alongside the external evidence base.

For researchers, journalists, consultants, and analysts who generate primary knowledge, not just consume it.

Available on Pro

Your research

Interviews, transcripts, reports, field notes

synthesised with
Academic papers
Policy documents
Think tank reports

Your material anchors the narrative. External sources corroborate, challenge, and extend — they don't displace.

The research was always there.

Thousands of papers, policy briefs, and think tank reports are published every year. Almost none get read past the abstract — not because the research is bad, but because the format is broken.

Now it works when you do.

Fieldnotes is built for the person who has twenty minutes on the train, not a sabbatical. Your commute, your workout, your lunch break — every listen fits where you actually are.

Your curiosity compounds.

Every Fieldnote lands in your Research Notebook. Add notes, tag ideas, subscribe to topics. Over time you build a personal knowledge base that gets richer every session.

The research was always there. Now it works when you do.

Writing a literature review

"The hardest part of a lit review is knowing what you don't know. Fieldnotes maps the contested claims, the methodological gaps, and the minority views — so your review covers the field, not just the consensus."

Students & PhD researchers

Before a client pitch or strategy meeting

"You have a day to get across a market or topic you've never worked in. Fieldnotes gives you the debate map, the main schools of thought, and the unresolved questions — a structured briefing, not a summary."

Strategy & business professionals

Teaching a new topic

"Before preparing a lecture or seminar, you need to know where the current debate actually sits — not just the textbook consensus. Fieldnotes surfaces the live tensions and the questions your students will push back on."

Faculty & academics

Writing a policy brief or report

"Before you write, you need the evidence base mapped — strongest arguments, strongest counter-arguments, and what's still contested. Fieldnotes does that synthesis in minutes, so you spend your time writing, not searching."

Policy & advisory professionals

Six things you get that no search can give you.

Guided audio narrative

Written as a story, not read from bullet points. Hook, complication, disagreement, open question. Set your length and context — the energy adapts.

Evidence map

Strongest arguments for, strongest counter-arguments, and unresolved tensions — all sourced. Not just the consensus. The full intellectual landscape.

Source integrity score

Every claim links to its source. See exactly what percentage traces to a specific paper versus broader synthesis. Honest about the difference.

Evidence gaps, honestly flagged

Where the evidence is geographically concentrated, methodologically thin, or missing practitioner voices — Fieldnotes names it, explains why it matters.

Lead with your own research

Upload your interviews, transcripts, or field notes. Let your material anchor the narrative, with the global literature brought in to extend and challenge.

Research Notebook + topic alerts

Take notes, tag insights, subscribe to topics. Get alerted when new evidence surfaces on the questions you're tracking.

Start free. Go deeper when you're ready.

10 Fieldnotes a month on the free plan. No credit card. No expiry.

Free

$0

Explore the product with no commitment.

  • 10 Fieldnotes per month
  • Full audio experience
  • Evidence map
  • Source list + integrity score
  • Choose listen length & context
  • Chapter navigation
  • Research Notebook + notes
  • Topic subscriptions & alerts
  • Upload your own research
Start exploring →

Pro

$20/month

For individuals who need the full picture.

  • Unlimited Fieldnotes
  • Full audio experience
  • Evidence map
  • Source list + integrity score
  • Choose listen length & context
  • Chapter navigation
  • Research Notebook + notes
  • Topic subscriptions & alerts
  • Upload your own research (up to 20 docs)
Get full access →
Most popular

Team

$50/month

For small teams working from shared evidence.

  • Unlimited Fieldnotes
  • Full audio experience
  • Evidence map
  • Source list + integrity score
  • Choose listen length & context
  • Chapter navigation
  • Research Notebook + notes
  • Topic subscriptions & alerts
  • Upload your own research (up to 20 docs)
  • Shared team notebook (up to 5 seats)
Get team access →

Institutional

Custom

For think tanks, universities, and research orgs.

  • Unlimited Fieldnotes
  • Full audio + evidence map
  • Research Notebook + topic alerts
  • Upload your own research — no doc cap
  • Shared team notebook + admin controls
  • Publish Fieldnotes under your brand
  • Dedicated onboarding + priority support
  • Volume pricing from $15/seat
Talk to us →

For institutions

Your research. Made legible.

Think tanks, universities, and research organisations use Fieldnotes to transform their publications into structured knowledge products — synthesised alongside global evidence, published on the platform, and shared with the audiences they're trying to reach.

Talk to us about an institutional pilot

What have you been meaning to understand?

Type a topic. Get the full picture — evidence, tensions, and the question worth sitting with — in the time you have.

Free to start. No credit card.

Cookie preferences

We use essential cookies to make Fieldnotes work. We'd also like to use analytics cookies to improve your experience.